@geoatom (View Post)
I can kind of get what you're saying, but I have to agree with EnganK in that it would be difficult to sift through or discern which saves are high quality / have been made with a substantial amount of effort or have somewhat interesting concepts from ones where it's more or less just "infinite spark loop" saves, for example.
Tbh, though, I kind of like the idea of having an optional reason as to why you downvote, for the purpose of gathering data in order figure out how to improve your save, but at the same time, it would probably be a bit tedious and even annoying at times to have to fill something out, whether you have a reason why you dislike it or not.
As for the 5 hours of gameplay requirement idea, I don't think it would be very effective, because I feel as if that's a criteria anyone, even the supposed toxic or trolling players, could meet, meaning it wouldn't be very effective in the end and most likely pointless.

In the end, liking and disliking is a function that I feel works fine as is, because, in the end, whether a save has high upvotes or downvotes is, at its root, a matter of opinion. That isn't to say, of course, that any of your saves may be actually bad, because in the end, it's more or less down to opinion, really.