The Powder Toy

Why is the Readme "poop"?

  • egkteam     27th Oct 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    I downloaded the new version of TPT, and, sure enough the readme is "poop". This is hilarious but why?

     

    P.S. Just asking.

  • jenn4     27th Oct 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    I guess no-one had time/motivation to write it suitable for TPT++, but I'm not sure, though.

    That is kinda stupid since there reads this on FAQ:
    "How do I use floodfill/prop/another tool?
    Check the wiki or README - they have good descriptions."
  • b-tenthousand     28th Oct 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    i think it's a joke text

  • Potbelly     28th Oct 2012 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • Box-Poorsoft     28th Oct 2012 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • jacob1     28th Oct 2012 Developer 0 Permalink
    A new README just needs to be written. And it can be almost exactly the same too, the only things that need to be changed are the hotkey section, (maybe the command line arguments too), and the Changelog.

    But things need to be added to it first, like a better tpt description. The one on the download page might work. Maybe a note about it being tpt++ too.
  • boxmein     28th Oct 2012 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    @jacob1 (View Post)
    A new readme should be in Markdown, at least. Some rich text wouldn't hurt. I could do it, but not immediately.
You need to login before you can post replies