my continuous nuclear work best with Uranium to Plutonium to Lava.With this Plutonium to Uranium problem,my reactor is really unstable.The neutrons can go to fuel clone.In the old PT,Plutonium to Lava really makes my reactor stable.No single neutrons can go to fuel clone.

well maybe we could impliment a basic element called rad waste instead of going super technical. [RWST] maybe and it could be used to fil some of the gaps. oh and if i could get feedbaack on that it would be great!

Well, this isn't going well. The thing is, for this atomic-decay-thing to work, we need at least TWO atomic elements to fill the gap, so [RWST] wouldn't be of much use.

well maybe its purpose lies within making bombs
and realism is not the 100% goal i think of the powder toy and this could add intrest but with the decay for both be [RWST] and plus they strictly said to lay off on the periodic table of elements. but ur right this aint goin out to well

@badsqueaker (View Post)
POWDER Toy
not
REALISTIC Toy

BudCharles:

@badsqueaker!1404
POWDER Toy
not
REALISTIC Toy

Are you serious?
You're serious?
I cannot believe you seriously did that.

Last Posted Date:

August 2010

@alexthesax (View Post) well it is all so true whats hes saying BUT different isotopes have different stability and lots of them need special concoctions of nuclear isotopes also if you were going to add this type of ionizing decay you would need to do a damn load of code and also add radiation and electronics to make it function the the normal way it should. I love the neptunium Idea though I would prefer caesium or polonium. also @badsqueaker you spelt fluorine wrong :D

@lucasspencer123 (View Post)
You spelled "spelled" wrong.

And Bud, seriously? Only necro if post is rellevant, this suggestion already failed.

@BudCharles (View Post)
I see a mega banhammer coming your way...

YOU NOOB.


* cctv hits BudCharles with the hammer of noobiness, permanently marking Bud with the mark of a noob...