Is SPNG the second strongest material?

  • DatOneFishVustono
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    Idk if it's correct or not, but I've tested it with some other strong materials, and it seems to be standing longer and it controls pressure for some time around 5-14 seconds, and it can stand a temperature of 9000+

  • U42
    25th July Member 1 Permalink

    coal with some modifications is almost indestructible BUT is affected by neutrons turning into wood that gets deformed and burns unlike the coal

  • DatOneFishVustono
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    Yeah, so that means SPNG is the second strongest element!

  • EnganK
    25th July Member 0 Permalink
    What does "the strongest element" even mean in the context of TPT?
  • DatOneFishVustono
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    @EnganK (View Post)

    The elements that can stand very damaging experiments for a long time or even survive them.

    You can see the test informations i ran here: https://powdertoy.co.uk/Wiki/W/The_Powder_Toy%27s_Deepest_Secret:_You_Won%27t_Believe_How_Simple_It_Is..html

    Edited 2 times by DatOneFishVustono. Last: 25th July
  • EnganK
    25th July Member 0 Permalink
    SPNG is completely impervious to pressure (which makes your claim that it can withstand pressure "for some time" odd), but is vulnerable to high temperatures unless it has absorbed water.
    If the only criteria are resistance to pressure, high temperatures and exposure to certain elements, then choosing SPNG as the "second strongest" is very strange. Why not HEAC? The only way to destroy HEAC is BOMB/DEST/SING or LIGH. Why not FRME or a huge amount of sensors and electronics that can only be destroyed by BOMB/DEST/SING? Why not VIBR with high life and tmp2 = 1, which is invulnerable even to BOMB?
  • DatOneFishVustono
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    Uhh.. So it seems i have some errors, HEAC is the real second strongest element

    Edited once by DatOneFishVustono. Last: 25th July
  • jm211
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    TLDR spng is weaker than many of the elements in the game. Test assumptions and premise are flawed as they do not consider other factors. 

    Edit: Imo clne, at least, beats heac, as clne cant be destroyed by bomb or dest, but can be destroyed by sing (and virs)

    Edited once by jm211. Last: 25th July
  • IEATDIRT
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    Run all those tests on FRME too. How about CLNE set to copy WATR? Have you tried MERC?

    You can't just go around making wild claims without providing real data. Saying "I ran a few tests" is laughably insufficient. Hey, I ran a few tests, turns out, oil floats in water, clearly I can conclude that if I cover myself in oil, I can fly when it rains.

    TPT's wiki is not a dumping ground for your writing homework. Please don't make useless pages on it. That could have easily been a forum post instead. 

  • DatOneFishVustono
    25th July Member 0 Permalink

    >:() I SAID I CORRECTED MY MISTAKES

    Edit 1: Stop mocking people >:(

    Edited once by DatOneFishVustono. Last: 25th July