Better FP system?

  • SillyZettian
    16th May Member 0 Permalink

    OK, the FP system may have gotten worst than the one before, from being view based to upvote based, personally I think it should be view based AND upvote based. If there is at least 150+ views on the save, something already done, 3 upvotes on the save in order for fp. So FP requirement I think it should be:

     

    150+ views

    3 upvotes

  • jacob1
    17th May Developer 1 Permalink
    Actually, neither system is view-based. We've never used views to determine what goes on front page. The only factors we've ever had are votes and time. We've now added a 3rd "randomness" pseudo-factor.

    Saves that get a lot of upvotes in a short time is what the formula looks for. (old and new). The new formula doesn't choose the top 15 saves, it gives each save a certain amount of points and weights them based off that. So lets say there's 3 saves with 100 points, 75 points, and 50 points. It chooses a random number between 1 and 100; 1 and 75, 1 and 50. Maybe the numbers it pulled are 23, 61, 4. So save B comes first, save A second, and save C last. That's how it works, just at a much greater scale.

    I think there is still a 3 upvote requirement to get on fp. But there's no view requirement, and I don't want to give any reason to incentivize view farming.