The Powder Toy

Water Surface Tension, Yes, NO? Answer. POLL

  • yoplait     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    The Peoples opinion on should there be surface tension for liquids.
  • baizuo     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Surface tension X
    More realistic water simulation O

    I think it's hard to code a better liquid system, that might eat @Simon and @Cracker64 a lot of time!
    But it's not impossible right?

    So I support.
  • yoplait     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    ok cool whos next, thanks @baizuo
  • plead-for-destruction     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @baizuo (View Post)
    crackers already done water equalisation....
    @yoplait (View Post)
    i support, good physics addition
  • DRAGONF0RCE     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Great idea, but it would be very difficult to program without causing lag with liquids. I support it if anyone can figure out how to do it.
  • cctvdude99     16th Oct 2011 Member 1 Permalink
    WAITWAITWAIT.

    Why would we even need surface tension...? It has NO uses.
    We don't have moving solids, so surface tension can't really be implemented while having a use, can it?
    And if a powder needs to float, you set its weight as less than WATR's weight.
  • 8669     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    what use would it be????
  • BloodLust     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    do you even KNOW how HARD it would be to code water tension

    we dont have moving solids so it has few uses

    this is NOT physics toy or realistic toy

    and seriously it has NO use, i mean NONE, in a particle simulator. all you could do with it would be to make tiny "bubbles" of watr on stuff -_-
  • yoplait     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Yes but if it had water tension it would boil better Watr.
  • plead-for-destruction     16th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @BloodLust (View Post)
    bubbles has no use either
You need to login before you can post replies