Astronomy

  • AngrySpam
    27th May 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @shroom207 (View Post)
    Im saying Wikipedia is a lie too...(this reply is to something back on the first page)

    Four score and seven years ago...
    Pluto, though people are to dumm to see it, is a real planet. i dont care what those smart people say...
    forget about that stuff ^

    Headaches are caused by galactic alignment of the stars :P
  • chrizztopher
    27th May 2012 Member 1 Permalink

    if you're confused about the big bang theory, read about M-theory. it expains it pretty well. on the other hand, if you are confused about the basic parts of big bang theory, this might make you more confused.

    EDIT: you will not understand it if you do not understand the 11th dimension. don't worry though, it gets simpler at 5+ dimensions. it's easier to live in the 5th dimension than the 3rd. more room to move around. and through.

  • shroom207
    27th May 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @chrizztopher (View Post)

     Heres a video on the 11th dimension by the way in case anyone wants to learn. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3Up5tPtkK8&list=FLrtSmUzzXvZU6FGwnvkJUlQ&index=1&feature=plpp_video

     

    @AngrySpam (View Post)

     Even if wikipedia is unreliable the Universe is everything though. Everything in existence. Its just a simple word created to describe everything. Theres nothing deep too it at all its very simple.

     

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+does+Universe+mean%3F

  • The-Con
    27th May 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    Who here agrees with the theory of the big freeze?

    It is the theory that the expansion of the universe will accelerate so fast that the galaxies begin to move faster than light, and at that point the galaxies and everything in them will essentially leave behind light. The whole universe would become cold and dark, and never able to support life as we know it.

    In the whole year and a half that I have been doing physics, we have never learnt about what happens in outer space (except for gravitational forces in space.) :(

  • mniip
    27th May 2012 Developer 0 Permalink
    there are 3 space dimensions because it's the most stable number, if there were 2, planens would fall onto stars, if there are 4 or more, planets would fly away
  • The-Con
    27th May 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @mniip (View Post)

     Your reasoning is illogical. For example, the fourth dimension (being time) does not cause a planet to fly away...

    If you wish to challenge the many physists, such as Stephen Hawking, then be sure you include your elaborate explanation.

    You also fail to understand how the dimensions exist.

  • mniip
    27th May 2012 Developer 0 Permalink
    3 space dimensions
  • EqualsThree
    27th May 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccNJDwJNngQ&feature=g-hist

     

    Does anyone know this?

     

    First commercial spacecraft docks with the ISS

  • mniip
    27th May 2012 Developer 0 Permalink
    also, I have a proof
    the gravitational formula is
    A=m2G/rd
    which creates static elliptical orbit only if d=3, try integrating it yourself!