how's my RPG?

  • hachouma
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    pretty simple, the stickman sucks a bit
  • Colt
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    RPG's don't have scopes, real life isn't battlefield 2.
    They are too inaccurate to use scopes, they are a cheap innefective way to neutralize a bigger force.
    If you actually believe they are really used, riddle me this, does a terrorist who can barely afford
    A decent shemagh actually have the money for a scope for an RPG? No.
    Please purge your mind of this misconception.
  • plead-for-destruction
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @Colt (View Post)
    your wrong, the battlefield models (stinger and whatnot) DO have scopes (in the military) and they are actually quite accurate.

    http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTpfcWaZU05GQYTDN2cHcaEpWw10DHaEtoyZrY7LzZXimoq_Qi5

    that is a standard RPG, in some cases the scope is unneeded, and he probably DID NOT copy the RPG from BF2 he probably got a picture like the above and used transparent windows.
  • Turban-of-Terror
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink


    @plead-for-destruction (View Post)
    A stinger RPG? Again, the United States never EVER uses weapons like RPG's unless absolutely nessesary, ex. About to be killed and its used as a last ditch effort. A stinger guided anti-aircraft missile is entirely different from an RPG. And I never said the game didn't incorporate this into their gameplay, but it is almost unheard of in an actual combat scenario. The United States Army uses (rarely) the M72 Law, it was retired during op. desert storm, the SMAW, which has a built in rifle to increase the probability of hitting the desired target, the tracer round being an inexpensive way to calculate trajectory, and the Stinger anti-aircraft lock-on missile, which detects frequency and thermal signals from the enemy aircraft. Of course, if you get an American made version of an RPG it will probably be better built then their Soviet counterpart, therefore increasing accuracy minimally.
  • plead-for-destruction
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @Turban-of-Terror (View Post)
    the Americans use the SMAW not the RPG so you'd be right about the technology difference, i was using the stinger as a reference its still in the close family of the RPG's
  • therocketeer
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @everyone
    dispite your jibber jabber about scopes and shit, none of you answerd the question.

    hachouma:

    how's my RPG?

    Your RPG is very good @hachouma. Your use of sponge is very entertaining and funny. It is also realistic.
  • plead-for-destruction
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @therocketeer (View Post)
    my posts were both replies in defence of his simulation, it should be clear of my decision, should it not?
  • therocketeer
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @plead-for-destruction
    Not really. All I see is talk about which rocket launchers use scopes.
  • Colt
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @therocketeer (View Post)
    Yes, I do believe this is indefinetly my decision, any response, to his thread. I'm
    providing feedback about his save, which was constructive criticism regarding
    The scope mounted on the top of the Rocket Propelled Grenade Launcher,
    (It actually doesn't stand for that, but that's just how most people call it)
    And how it was slightly unrealistic.
    @plead-for-destruction (View Post)
    Exactly.
  • limelier
    3rd Feb 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    Let me translate what therocketeer said:
    " No one gives a fuck about scopes and whatever, get back ontopic, you twerps. Nice RPG, btw. "

    Nice RPG, btw.