LINK (new element suggestion)

  • cip
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    This is not a website that you run, so I think for now it's safe to say that we don't know what the actual common behavior is. There are dozens of saves with links in them, and I know I personally click them (and I don't click ads in web sites - to me these behaviors do not appear to be related), so in my experience, it is useful. Do you have any thoughts about the particle itself?
  • pilojo
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @cip (View Post)

    Yes I do, we already have links, therefore this is useless.

  • cip
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    The difference between this and link signs is explained in my original post. =)
  • pilojo
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    @cip (View Post)

    I know, still useless, provides one small difference that isn't essential.

  • Minishooz
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    Use: a two page spark maze or a game with levels on different pages.

    EDIT: there will be more uses to think of :D
  • mniip
    27th Jan 2012 Developer 0 Permalink
    Bad idea, there may be some viruses with it, like continuously sparking a LINK,

    [BTRY][METL][LINK]
  • limelier
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    Pilojo, shut your mouth.

    I like the idea.

    @mniip (View Post)
    If you had bothered reading you would see it doesn't take spark, you have to spark it manually.
  • cip
    27th Jan 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @mniip: I mentioned this in the original post. LINKs cannot send or receive sparks to or from any other element type -- precisely to avoid that possibility. =)

    I wrote: "The reason for the strict spark behavior is to prevent automated, spammy popups. The idea is you have to click the particle manually."