Electrons idea

  • CrimsonCloud
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @disturbed666 (View Post)
    Yeah that seems to be a problem that electrons react with next to nothing all I know of is electrons + neutrons= Hydrogen and that's about all :(
  • disturbed666
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @CrimsonCloud (View Post)
    indeed it's kind of boring to see just one reaction to it and you can't even make a laser of it cause if you try it with pcln it screws up your laser i already tried it, that's why i was thinking of something that would make it able to change that.

    thanks for your aprovement on this idea ;p
  • CrimsonCloud
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @disturbed666 (View Post)
    No problem ;D but its true about the laser I found out the hard way after trying to create one and then fail XD
  • disturbed666
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @CrimsonCloud (View Post)
    whahaha xD i just picked my old laser and changed ctype of pcln cause i wanted to see if it worked before making a new one
  • cctvdude99
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @therocketeer (View Post)
    Hurrr durrr:

    therocketeer:

    1) already mentioned - electron lasers, just like NEUT lasers. You could also funnel NEUT and ELEC efficiently to create hadron collider simulations and stuff.

    ELEC move in the same way that NEUT move, right?
    And NEUT lasers are inefficient and horrible.

    See my point about the NEUT? I agree, you cannot make an electron laser, but they are "just like NEUT lasers" and therefore have no point. The only difference would be the element, and that wouldn't make a difference to the laser.
    Use invalidated.

    therocketeer:

    2)You could make an ISOZ reactor with a TESC coating and then a METL coating to create an alternative powersource - good for new reactors and things.

    Why not use ISOZ and PHOT? All you are doing is adding a bit of TESC and swapping PSCN and NSCN for some METL, a pointless exercise.
    Use invalidated.



    Right then. :)
  • CrimsonCloud
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    First off "cctv" your wrong abut the ineffience of a electron laser I did make one once I didn't last long but long enough to see a result the electrons did spark metl eventually melting all of it when the temp reaches maximum also it destroyed metl bit by bitwith each electron hitting it so no using therockteer's idea is a good idea which could help the laser obtain a more solid form rather then just shooting one pixel every minute

    Use 2) so what we are just suppose to use the same thing atleast make electrons an energy source to be used in reactors as stated above but apperently you have no creativity a dry mind and an even worse personality

    There we go ;)

    EDIT: I seem to have mistaken the ineffiency of electron laser not aneut sorry for that but neospector does have a point using Invisible doesn't effect it but my point being in my response to the first use is that by adding elec to neutrons would only be Beneficial
  • Neospector
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @CrimsonCloud (View Post)
    He said NEUT lasers are inefficient, not ELEC.
    However,
    False, create a PHOT laser with an INVS cap. NEUT lasers have the same efficiency as PHOT lasers.
  • therocketeer
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @cctvdude99 (View Post)
    you are too false, you don't see potential, you see things half empty.

    "Hurr durr"
    the effeciency of a laser is based on how well the energy partical conducts heat to the target. Nothing to do with irregularities in the beam. I don't know why you hate this idea so much? this iddea has so much potential, you just can't admitt it.

    But, overall your opinion is just as strong as a plywood fence against a tank.
  • CrimsonCloud
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
  • asdf72
    12th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @cctvdude
    @therocketeer
    Do you guys hate each other? Is this behaviour normal?
    *ontopic* There needs to be a way to make ELEC, as you can only make NEUT and PHOT without clone or conv.