new temperature limit

  • commandog
    5th Aug 2011 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • code1949
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @dnerd (View Post)
    And have most reactors simulate Chernobyl or Three-Mile Island, or Fukushima.
  • Jackeea
    5th Aug 2011 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • mniip
    5th Aug 2011 Developer 0 Permalink

    MasterMind555:

    @disturbed666!145924
    We don't need it.


    rly? i need.
    mainly for WIFI
  • Jackeea
    5th Aug 2011 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • cctvdude99
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    cctvdude99:

    "A larger number means nothing at all if nothing happens when you reach it." -cctv, 2011


    I s'pose you could have more WIFI channels, but why not just increase the limit for WIFI then? I'm sure it's possible. If it is, problem solved.
  • airstrike52
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @cctvdude99 (View Post)
    Nice job quoting yourself. You're not impressing anyone.
  • Jackeea
    5th Aug 2011 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • therocketeer
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Jackeea (View Post)
    if you don't have anything useful to say, DON'T SAY IT.
  • cctvdude99
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @therocketeer
    I agree tottaly.

    @airstrike52
    What @therocketeer said.
    Also, I'm not trying to impress anyone. It's called the truth, and you should actually read the contents of the post.