@Lockheedmartin (View Post)
:< Some people's top saves are in the negatives, I know mine was.

@Lockheedmartin (View Post)
Saves would be hard to intergrate to the REP, Since Counting the top saves won't add REP if you have alot of good saves else then the top one, counting the number of saves would just create save spam, so maybe the Average Score would be the Best, but still, some peoples are Great Forumers but don't make Saves...

@CAC-Boomerang
I think the

Report User

thing would work great. Then again, you could just use a conversation.

I'll wait until the math is figured, give me the math and then I'll voice my full opinion.
@Lockheedmartin (View Post)
I don't like the entire save thing, because I usally save stuff as stamps and on my computer, so for example, If you see my saves page you'll see pretty bad saves, but on my computer and stamps, I have a bunch of complicated ones, (including a failed attempt on a non-binary calculator :(), so I think we should kick the whole save things, but I won't say anything until the math is figured out.

I think we're starting to overcomplicate things a little bit.

I'll repost what I said and what I think about the idea just to make things clear.

---

Up-voting should be entitled to anyone, and down-votes should be exclusive to moderators. They should be about the thread, not exactly a post.

Also, the users can +1 or -1, but they must send a review reading as why they want to +1/-1. Also, moderators may have a button available to them that allows them to reset a score.

@Lockheedmartin (View Post)
I don't know. If Simon would agree the +/- for posts/threads. would be the best option but, other than that idk how we'd get the rep calculated.