Official Game Feedback

  • therocketeer
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @tudoreleuu (View Post)
    yes, it is fantastic for that kind of thing.
    @nmd (View Post)
    Suggest it in Jacob1's mod, he's the one who made this, he's the one to talk to.
  • BoredInSchool
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    nmd:

    @therocketeer (View Post)
    but it would make more sense to replace the sing that being created with black hole...
    that way, you could chose to have it take effect or not (via Newtonian gravity)

    or, if a powder is needed, gravity bomb.

    I chose to make it produce SING in my suggestion instead of BHOL because BHOL is solid. However, I do think that GBMB may make a good substitute for SING.
  • therocketeer
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @BoredInSchool (View Post)
    GBMB is a good alternative because is doesn't "kill" all the energy, yet it does sort of simulates the quantum energy released from a SING upon death.
  • BoredInSchool
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Yeah, mabye I kinda overdid it a bit in my goal to keep it as real as possible.... I recommend a changeover to GBMB. That should make it controllable. It will also allow me to continue the fusion chain in the future.
  • therocketeer
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @BoredInSchool (View Post)
    yeah, best make these changes now while this is still beta, otherwise there is a chance for save breaking.
  • jacob1
    5th Aug 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    @BoredInSchool (View Post)
    If you want, I can change it to GBMB, but I already did make it more controllable in the newest version of my mod so that if the H2 isn't over about 8000 C, no SING will be produced. I'm not sure if GBMB would be the best idea though, because it would make fusion act differently depending on if newtonian gravity is disabled or not, and gravity bomb would actually not allow you to continue the chain because it sticks to a particle and then explodes. I'll wait to see if you still want me to change it before I get the new changes into the official.
  • nmd
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @BoredInSchool (View Post)
    :D

    btw, why does both white and black hole compress deut? shouldn't white hole expand it? also shouldn't this also apply to mercury?

    Edit:
    @jacob1 (View Post)
    well, that actually sound better...
  • therocketeer
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @nmd (View Post)
    MERC already expands because of the heat, otherwise, IDK about the rest.
    @jacob1 (View Post)
    yeah, that does sound more controllable.
  • nmd
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @therocketeer (View Post)
    yeah, i know, just like deut, but black whole and white hole don't have any effect on it.
  • BoredInSchool
    5th Aug 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @jacob1: I see your point.... very well then, I think I have a solution that will satisfy all involved. How about you just make it so that CO2 still produces SING when it fuses, but it is much more rare. Like mabye there is only a 1% chance (1 out of every 100 particles) that a particle of SING is produced when a particle of CO2 is fused. That would allow for more controllable CO2 fusion, make available more potential explosive power, and would allow me much more freedom and ease if and when I feel that TPT has gotten to the point where the fusion chain must be expanded to OXYG and beyond.

    Also, can you make it so that the SING produced by the reaction has only 10 life instead of 500? That would also help people make CO2 fusion reactors.
Locked by Simon: Getting a bit cramped