good point. i agree with you. Electron was another one that was constantly shot down but is now implemented.

yeah as i read this i was thinking the reason they havent added any of the realistic suggestions is that there getting lazy, there used to be new types of reactions coming in and all kinds of new ideas not just things  like when this touches that it does that and what ever! They havent added something intresting for a bit as its obviusly harder to code and they are always buggy in betas but someone should come up with something and then they make it! Also fighter is a real noobish sugestion! I hate it it makes TPT to like Powder Game! Also at my school theres a massive fight going on about whats best TPT or Powder Game so please make something new so TPT can win!
Thanks for reading hope you agree - AwesomeONE101

@awesomeone101 (View Post)
You should be really f*cking happy about what the developers do for you, they got no reason at all to go up and make one of the very best physics simulation games out there! And for what? Get feedback like yours? If you think it sucks soo bad go and make your own s*it game if you think it's soo easy. God it's statements like yours that made cracker almost completely leave the comunity, I f*cking hate you >:@

@awesomeone101 (View Post)
easy win against PG = make nuclear bomb.

what? im not going agast them im just saying that theres not many new interactive elements and it seems the devs havent been updatinmg so much

Man, the words Powder Game so much as pop up and I find the thread.  This isn't some kind of competition to find which is better (that much is obviously PT), so there's no need to state it as such.

@therocketeer (View Post)
@awesomeone101 (View Post)
Are you two f*cking kidding me? You do realize that we aren't supposed to flame or criticize PG right? PG moderators such as @QwentyuiopThePie do use the TPT forums and you don't see them flaming or criticizing TPT.

They don't seem to be criticizing PG that I can see, I'm just saying it's not really a competition so that's certainly no excuse for specific elements in PT.

As related to this thread:  Yeah, there are many elements in PT which don't do much or which may be seen as redundant.  However, the suggestibility of elements can change over time.

To take an example from my experience, there's metal from PG.  Before thunder was added, metal would have been considered a complete waste of a precious elemental spot.  However, after thunder, the view on the potential of metal changed.

Long story short:  If the rest of a game changes in such a way as to make the elements more pleasing than they were when originally suggested, then they may be more suitable to add to the game.

@code1949 (View Post)
what the fuck do you mean? Did I say anything against PG?

correction, spark was there b4 thunder was and metal sufficed for using it just fine.