PTT memory forum

  • dgreen
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I have an idea. Anyone who wants to join this project may join. My mission is to come up with the best system of memory in TPT. This is a project where we will work together not independently. the memory card must be at leat 2 bytes, have METL/INWR/PTCT/NTCT outputs, use less than 2 frequencies of wifi and be compatible with more of its type. It also must store memory and have a read button. THIS SHOULD NOT BE JUST A FANCY SPARK MULTIPLIER.
  • dnerd
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink


    16 bits of memory, very compact, a METL wire at the bottom clears it all.

    the true best system of memory is Lucasspencer123's aray based memory, it is very hard to understand. And slightly difficult to implement, but huge capacity.
  • theKJM
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    move to the group forum
  • dgreen
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    this isnt a group
    @dnerd
    if the ptct/ntct is supposed to loop, it isnt.

    right now this is the best I can do

  • The-Con
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Lucasspencer123's isn't that hard to understand, it is just hard to replicate or remake as your own, because it is so complicated.

    @dnerd
    Yours doesn't seem to do much.

    I have a visual representation of memory: (inputs are at the bottom, clear is after the inputs at the bottom and to recieve out put, spark at the end on the bottom (PSCN))
  • dnerd
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Oh, heat sim is supposed to be on in mine, it is now.
  • dgreen
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @The-Con (View Post)
    lucasspencer's circutry:
    1. uses way too much of the screen
    2. uses a lot of wifi frequencies
    3. is diffucult to remake
    4. cant be added to easily, or quickly
    @dnerd
    It works but... could it be smaller or more efficient? Also, there is no read button.
  • dnerd
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @dgreen (View Post)
    hmm, i can make read optional, as for smaller, definitely, but i would use wifi.
  • dgreen
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @dnerd
    You can use 2 frequencies, however dont go crazy because this may or may not be an upgrade to a powder toy computer, and those use a lot of wifi to begin with.

    good example of what this is about, this is capable of storing memory and meets all the criteria, except the 2 bytes part.

  • dnerd
    23rd Apr 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @dgreen (View Post)
    you know what? i have a better idea...



    there it is.
Locked by antb: Retry as a group.