Best XOR logic gate ever?
-
How you like my XOR logic gate?
Smallest i could make.
What I wanted was:
Only 1 Inputsignal had to be enough for each input.
Not to much cooldown.
What I got:
(What I've seen) 100% reliable.
Usual cooldown, about 75 frames.146469View Save 146469
If you need other gates fully working for a ALU or something, contact me. -
If you input the inputs at different times, then it malfunctions and outputs, it is good for starters, but it isn't the best ever. Check out my set of gates, they are smallest and reliable.96171View Save 96171
-
Well at my conditions yours doesn't work.
I didn't want to have a small one.
It should be 100% reliable (sparks have to come at the same time).
With gates of these types you can build ALUs, with yours you can't. -
Yeah, actually I can, I have built a full ALU, it can increment decrement add subtract, then I have a separate multiplication and a separate division unit. It is 8-bit, and it works just fine. What do you mean it doesn't work? It is 100% reliable, I had one that wasn't quite 100%, but this one works. This works under constant sparking which is required for an ALU. You are talking about the XOR right?
-
It works under constant sparking, thats the point, mine only needs 1. This 1 outputs correctly.
If you spark your XOR at both inputs it gives out a spark. -
But that is the point I'm trying to get across, large scale electronics REQUIRE constant sparking! For small projects yours may be good, but as for large scale, it would be worthless, too large and not constant sparking. Check my save now, I just whipped one up, it is the second one under XOR, that should work for you and smaller.
-
Well, since PT isn't realistic, I interpret a spark as a specified load of energy, not 1 electron.
Which is the way it works in reality. I try to be as near as reality for my own.
Also, large scale electronics using constant sparking are slow, if you'd build an binary adder out of mine, it would be the (what I've seen) fastest and 100% reliable.
If we're talking about constant sparking, your's might be faster, but still not 100% reliable. -
You do realize that a computer works with constant sparking, then the clock cycle hits, and the constant sparking starts all over, it is constant spark, even if only for a fraction of a second, it is constant spark. I would also like to see proof of something you say can be faster your way than with constant sparking.
-
If you'd read, you'd know that I take a PT Spark for a short time constant spark in real life.
-
Well guess what, no matter how hard you try, PT is not REAL. It is a fun simulator, not a physics simulator that can simulate the real world. I realize you want it to be as real as possible, but that doesn't mean it is the right or best way. If you think that is the way to go, you are welcome to, but I personally will be sticking to constant sparking, because that is the way I do it, and so do many others.
