CLNE is not indestructible

  • ChargedCreeper
    7th Jun 2015 Member 1 Permalink

    There is CLNE, and BCLN yet CLNE is still able to be destroyed by SING. Is this a bug or intended?

  • greymatter
    8th Jun 2015 Member 0 Permalink
    @ChargedCreeper (View Post)
    Totally intended.
  • Factorial
    8th Jun 2015 Banned 1 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
    Edited once by Factorial. Last: 8th Jun 2015
  • 12Me21
    23rd Jun 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    "Singularity. Creates huge amounts of negative pressure and destroys everything"

    Edited once by 12Me21. Last: 23rd Jun 2015
  • Catelite
    24th Jun 2015 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    SING is a jokey utility element, yeah. It's not really -supposed- to. But people making things wanting them to be destructible end up using CLNE often enough.
  • tmo97
    24th Jun 2015 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • Catelite
    24th Jun 2015 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    ..No? o.o;
  • ChargedCreeper
    25th Jun 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    Catelite:

    SING is a jokey utility element, yeah. It's not really -supposed- to. But people making things wanting them to be destructible end up using CLNE often enough.

     

    Isn't the whole point of bcln to be a destructible version of clne? It seems redundant to me...

  • Catelite
    25th Jun 2015 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Traditionally, CLNE -is- indestructible. SING cheats. :P