Really?
-
On the comments, most of my ideas were rejected on my last topic. Sorry, for trying to help make the game better. The sandbox, has trees, that grow, moving solids, and clouds. The powder game also has seeds, ants, birds,boxes and balls, that move. My ideas weren't meant to be useful, do you know how many kids I know that run around in a circle for hours, letting fightmen chase them, maybe if you listen to some of the suggestions, you could make the game more fun, I approved of a lot of ideas that iv'e heard of, maybe you should too. If you add more elements, features, and powers for the stickman people will love it more. . The point of feedback, is to listen to our ideas, not to just reject them. How many other people, do you reject. I hope you know that ther isn't a point to create feedback, if it's just a big reject page. All I did was ask, sorry if I asked in the wrong way, or if there was only bad ideas, it was my first time posting, so you didn't have to go and reject it,only a few people, explained the rejection, others just thought it was stupid. Thanks, for telling me that, Felix.
-
If you truly want those ideas to be implemented - do it yourself! That's the beauty of an open source free project, there literally is no barrier to contribution. Even if your changes may not be merged into the main TPT application they will still be out there and usable for people. Ask not what an open source project can do for you but what you can do for an open source project. If you have questions about how to start modding TPT join the IRC channel (information can be found by searching the forum on how to do so) and you can get help.
If you did not care about what people have to say, why make this topic?
-
Ya rly!
-
Awesomemachines, because of your displayed ignorance of our feedback, as well as your arrogance, I'm wish I don't have to bother with why your topic sucked.But I'm going to anyway.
First of all, mutiple suggestion topics are usually terrible in quality and split attention each element. The suggestions' chances of being implemented are reduced. Second, your suggestions are useless. We're not the Powder Game or The Sandbox community; we're the Powder Toy community, an we don't want useless junk. Third, you didn't even ask why they should be implemented aside from an implied "it would to cool to add".
TL;DR Your topic sucked and was ignored because:
1.Mulitple suggestions divided attention.
2.The suggestions were useless.
3.You gave no reasons to add them.
-
@awesomemachines (View Post)
>The sandbox, has trees, that grow, moving solids, and clouds.
The community here deems these ideas boring, it seems. Moving solids would be cool but they cause a lot of problems with how TPT works. A lot.
@awesomemachines (View Post)
>do you know how many kids I know that run around in a circle for hours
Two when you look at a mirror?
@awesomemachines (View Post)
>more fun
Fun is overrated, however TPT can do fun if you put your mind to it.
@awesomemachines (View Post)
>I approved of a lot of ideas
Yes, yes you did.
@awesomemachines (View Post)
>And I don't care what you have to say about this.
#SO #BRAVE -
Didn't I tell you I don't care what you have to say.
