negative / positive

  • hacker45
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I think there should be negative / positive charged particles for changing elements by ions.
  • surfcash
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    what are the uses?
  • hacker45
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    make chemical changes more interesting?
  • surfcash
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    idk how to code but im pretty sure this would be hard, setting what changes would occur for each element could take a very long time
  • hacker45
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    but it might be worth it...maybe?
  • Neospector
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @hacker45 (View Post)
    If things start getting more and more complex, like ions as you suggested, then we need more and more variables. For these you'd need two more, one negative and one positive. And these would need to be in every element they effect as well, as well as the code for the reactions they would cause.
  • disturbed666
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    i think it's a good idea but this has been suggested before if i'm right.
    this would make tpt more interresting ofcourse but i think there is a lot of recoding needed. maybe implenting positive wire pwir and negative wire nwir (not like wire more like metal so pmet or nmet could also be a name).
    but if you talk about all elements then every electronic needs recoding i guess. for example btry should have a positive and negative pole, and the reactions should be changed like positive spark on water makes o2 and negative makes h2o.
  • hacker45
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    yeah that sounds interesting
  • cooldaddy96
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @hacker45 (View Post)
    You do realise this is esentially magnetisim, which has been rejected tons of times before?
  • hacker45
    19th Sep 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    ions have a different purpose any ways we could just leave out magnetism
Locked by jacob1: necro