Element Suggestion : Quarks

  • Philip153
    6th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    @Lord_Bowserinator  YOU ARE WRONG YOURSELF Left/Right Quarks DOES NOT exist.

     

    The Only Six Quarks are Up, Down, Strange, Charm, Botton, Top (Listed according to mass)

     

    NO DESTRUCTIVE CRITICIZM PLEASE

  • Klus
    7th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    I already mentioned that left/right quarks don't exist.

  • Philip153
    13th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    @Lagnadium Sorry, didn't notice. I'm such a ...... :*(

  • Security-Drone
    13th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    I remember bringing up quarks a while ago... How is it that people Haven't reviewed it yet?

    Also the idea of creating them would be nice as they could make other energy particles.

  • ROHANman
    13th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    Yea, these would really add cool interactions. Atleast the way I see it.

  • Philip153
    14th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    @ROHANman I think that quarks should form 75% Protons and 25% Neutrons when colided.

  • the_new_powder99999
    16th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    How doesn't this break saves? It looks like it would break any fisson reactor that uses an insl wall by putting hygn in them which would fuse and ingite the insl, making it instantly explode. The half life value means there needs to be a whole new variable, which slows down everything a lot. The fact that they turn into anything they touch and their ability to appear almost everywhere would cause all kinds of chaos.

     

    Basically, this wouldn't work in unmodded tpt, it might be good for a mod, but you could fix these problems and get it into the actual game instead.

  • ROHANman
    17th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    Exceptions can be made for cerain elements to prevent any serious save breaking. Also how much slower would the new variables make the game run?  <----- Genuine curiosity.

  • KydonShadow
    17th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    Soooo, I dont see how adding new elements breaks saves. If you just have it so that created quarks have a random life/ctype/whatever value of 1 or 0 (1=up, 0=down), then you dont need to worry about anything. No need to start going crazy with charm, strange, top and bottom quarks. 

     

    My only qualm with quarks is their use. I dont see one. If it were added in an update, it would be for no reason other than to even have a release update. They can be used in material-gens, sure, but thats it.

     

    It does feel as though we are trying to get smaller and smaller, doesn't it?

  • the_new_powder99999
    17th Feb 2015 Member 0 Permalink

    I don't know about the variable, I only remember that someone said that it lags before.