ELEC + NEUT

  • disturbed666
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Plamoid (View Post)
    kinda like spam post -_-
    before commenting you should probably use the pink chewing gum in your head to start thinking is this post useful, I really doubt it are brains....
  • tommig
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @disturbed666 (View Post)
    Pink chewing gum...
    Hehe! I like that one, I'm gonna have to steal it!
  • cctvdude99
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Plamoid (View Post)
    Wow !!!
    You just necro posted while spamming at the same time!

    Come on, seriously?
    Can't you use that poor lonely brain cell of yours?
  • Videogamer555
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Well I know this isn't designed to be realistic, and that might explain why protons haven't been added yet, but to say that electrons+neutrons= hydrogen is flat out WRONG!!!!!!! This reaction NEVER makes hydrogen.

    electrons+protons=hydrogen. So if you refuse to add protons, then fine. At least don't then go and try to make it up by saying electrons + neutrons = hydrogen, because it DOESN'T! If you want something to add to electrons to make hydrogen, then you also will need protons, plain and simple. Even if the ONLY PURPOSE of protons is to colide with electrons to make hydrogen (and thus protons have no special reaction with any "elements" other than neutrons), I say that protons SHOULD be added, and the reaction between electrons and neutrons that makes hydrogen should be REMOVED.
  • Neospector
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    Videogamer555:

    Well I know this isn't designed to be realistic, and that might explain why protons haven't been added yet, but to say that electrons+neutrons= hydrogen is flat out WRONG!!!!!!! This reaction NEVER makes hydrogen.

    electrons+protons=hydrogen. So if you refuse to add protons, then fine. At least don't then go and try to make it up by saying electrons + neutrons = hydrogen, because it DOESN'T! If you want something to add to electrons to make hydrogen, then you also will need protons, plain and simple. Even if the ONLY PURPOSE of protons is to colide with electrons to make hydrogen (and thus protons have no special reaction with any "elements" other than neutrons), I say that protons SHOULD be added, and the reaction between electrons and neutrons that makes hydrogen should be REMOVED.
    They are not saying Electrons+Neutrons=Hydrogen, you misunderstand. They are saying that in the game, this is the reaction.

    Powder Toy does not simulate things on a particle level. Thus, there is absolutely no need for PROT. That is the reason they have not been added, not realism, but pointlessness. An element must have 3 uses, and that does not include reactions with existing elements.
  • KIRILL
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    @quaternio (View Post)

    Fuck you! It is my idea!

    I written it before! But they not understood me.

    And if you want, you may code matter and effects for yourself with VC++

    Step 1) Go to WIKI > How to build --- Win32 code setup.

    Step 2) download cracker's powder, and Visual C++

    Step 3) Copy source files and folders from zip to your {created} project folder {may create this folder in C:\My documents...}

    Step 4) Run VC++ and open project file "crackerpowder" {not solution file}, then open powder.h in includes.

    Step 5) About protons electrons vodorod hydrogen etc...

       Open the file "elec.c" , which locate in src\elements

    THEN FIND THIS SENTENSE:

    if ((r&0xFF)==PT_NEUT)
    {
    part_change_type(r>>8, x+rx, y+ry, PT_H2);
    parts[r>>8].life = 0;
    parts[r>>8].ctype = 0;
    }


    And change PT_NEUT to your particle or element, which will be changed to H2

    For example I changes that way:

    if ((r&0xFF)==PT_p)
    {
    part_change_type(r>>8, x+rx, y+ry, PT_H2);
    parts[r>>8].life = 0;
    parts[r>>8].ctype = 0;
    }

    But for it you SHOULD HAVE

    PT_p or PT_PROT

    If you haven't this elements, than you should delete this sentenses, and compile

    GOODLUCK)))))))))))))))

  • asdf72
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @KIRILL (View Post)
    Don't swear. PROT has been suggested tons of times. And rejected.
  • richyuser
    19th Nov 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I can't understand what you're saying