My 'Super Bunker'

  • code1949
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Videogamer555 (View Post)
    From this we can see that the bunker requires cellular automata cryogenics, bomb powder shielding, pump pressure insulation and BRAY-[P/N]TCT cooling.
  • Videogamer555
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I didn't use any celular atomata nor "bomb" type powder in my nukes used here. I just used a simple nuke design triggered by thunder, which pressurizes plutonium which gives off neutrons which fission an over charged deuterum (using the command "!set life deut 1000").
    Edited by Videogamer555, 2011-07-01 06:30:34
  • code1949
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Videogamer555 (View Post)
    No, I mean the bunker requires all that to be nuke resistant. Your nuke works fine. I was explaining the possible additions to the bunker to strengthen it.
  • JH-Darkfire
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    No, he was explaining what the bunker needed in order to not be destroyed.
    Edit: *cries*
    Edited by JH-Darkfire, 2011-07-01 06:28:03
  • Videogamer555
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Also this super bunker can be very heavily damaged and nearly completely destroyed using one or two instances of the larger of these 2 bombs, even without the option for heated air turned on.



    Just make a stamp of the larger of these 2 thunder bombs, and place one or two of them in the space above the bunker.

    Using the smaller one will still penetrate to the upper layer of the bunker, and the one beneath that as well.
  • JH-Darkfire
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink


    Also, if BOMB is cheating:

  • code1949
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    Woodchippers everything using ambient heat and shrapnel.
    (@eternity is a group account for eternity administrative users)

    Why the hell is everyone posting WMD's we have already established that the bunker is not that resilient.
    Edited by code1949, 2011-07-01 06:47:08
  • cctvdude99
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    code1949:

    Why the hell is everyone posting WMD's we have already established that the bunker is not that resilient.


    I'll post a bomb that destroys a bit of it anyway...
  • Videogamer555
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    This shows the latest way I found to take out the bunker. And this time there's no nuclear reaction in the bomb.

  • desred3
    1st Jul 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    Thank you all for your help, I'm going to work on the 'Super Bunker III' in the winer holidays, that start next week, so i'll have a LOT of free time. I'll start after I finish the save I'm currently working at, I'm sure you'll all love it.

    Other thing I have to say is: WHY THE HELL does almost everyone use all those not-really-pro nukes made of ridiculous ammounts of BCLN and/or Thunder, and you say the bunkers are weak?!?!

    (sorry for the caps, I had to enphatize that)