i've been looking into this and from a few of the solar system maps i've seen which include the orbit of this planet they currently plot it almost directly in the path of jupiter. im pretty sure we'd of noticed if jupiter was a) wobbling/shifting due to the gravity of this planet or b) being flung off into deep space. just a thought i had, i might be completely wrong.
@el-midgeto(View Post) You can't see something that hasn't happened yet. Time predictions are not very accurate for a planet that is only recently known as a possibility.
One thing is for sure... there is a large mass orbiting the sun, that spends a lot of time in the outer-ness of the solar system. NASA probes discovered the presence of a very large mass (It may be larger than what I described) that is effecting the orbit of outer planets.
i'm aware of this, just seems odd that the woman that made this a mainstream theory said it would happen in 2003, it obviously didn't happen and she said she faked the date because she thought given the real date governments would instigate martial law thus consigning humanity to it's death. if governments believed her and would use this information like she said they would for 2012 surely martial law would've come into effect in 2003 if governments believed her and she was right? just seems to full of holes and coincidences for me to buy it.
@shroom207(View Post) 4-8 times the size of earth. some say 4-8 times the size of Jupiter, but it is more often referred to as 4-8 times the size of earth, and so is recorded in ancient History. There is so much we don't know about the outer reaches of our solar system. (Think of a solar system like an atom, the sun to Pluto is the nucleus and from the nucleus to the edge of the atom is the rest of the solar system, comprised of hundreds of planets, large and small that we can not see... too dark.) when I am talking about the comparison between the atom and the solar system, think on the lines of: the nucleus/ (sun-->Pluto) is a grain of sand in the middle of a football/ soccer field, and from that grain of sand to the edge of the field is asteroids, planets and then the end of the solar system.
@Neospector(View Post) Yes @shroom207(View Post) but the solar system does, and so does the universe... We just can't comprehend that. The universe is defined by what occupies it, and it is expanding quickly. Everything must end. For something not to end, it would mean it is still being made, which is illogical because it doesn't end and something that is being made ends, which means the thing that doesn't end is being made while ending where it is not being made... does that make sense?