hacker45:

you obviously never learned that a cloud is water vapor

Ummm... I learned that in Year 1 of school. And there's nothing obvious about that, I just misunderstood your first post for a H2O2 rocket engine, used in a few US experimental craft.

Anyway, it's a good idea, but it's like that guy who suggested we raise TPT's speed higher so we can have moving solids, but definitely not as dumb. - In that sense I say it's an idea without any real evidence how to build it in real life.

Keep in mind, also, O2 and H2 burn, but fused together they omit fire, so you might want to include a bit of Iron in your engine.

That is in real life, I just compared your idea to one suggested about TPT, not to mention O2 and H2 both are similar and burn in real life, and fused together they extinguish fires, and in real life electrified iron seperates them both.

@Jackeea (View Post)

Perpetual motion is impossible, or at least logically impossible. Modern turbofan and turbojet engines cannot generate more power than they can take in, so instead they go as close as they can to efficiency.

Getting simpler, Hooking a generator to a motor connected vice versa via a belt would sound like it would work, but the friction of the belt slows down. Some people have gotten very close, which their final result showed them that energy is always lost somehow, regarding perpetual motion impossible.