Okay... whelp, here we go. positives: realism. I don't see any others. negatives: Slow light. Boring reactions. Too many elements. Cluttered elements. Useless elements. Save breaking reactions. Save breaking physics. If there are any I have forgotten, then forgive me. I think there is a LOT of them.
My method is my own education as a Chemical Engineering major and a textbook. I think having TPT being realistic would be VERY boring and complex to everyone else. Chemistry involves lots of math and theory involved with electrons and how the charges interact.
Otherwise, I don't think we should be arguing this realistic idea. It's been argued before and stayed the same. The Powder Toy was not built to be realistic.
List of things that are unrealistic in TPT:
Protons
Electrons
Neutrons
Fluid dynamics
Mass
Gravity
Stickman
Law of conservation of mass (CRAY)
Electricity (IRL it is instant) (no DC/AC in TPT)
Virus
Acid
Piston (IRL it uses compressed gas)
Pump (IRL moves stuff around)
Walls
electricity also no ground/return, all circiuts in tpt are open. IRL every single electronic save would do absolutely nothing.
I don't know about you, but the OP should request lock.
i know that
Electrons
Neutrons
Acid
Piston
are realistic
i was thinking of that and i found out that you are completely right after all
didn't you see the last post ? ------> @Protcom (View Post) <-------