Powered Electronic suggestion: HTMU

  • Nab1929
    10th Apr 2012 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned
  • therocketeer
    10th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    @code1949 (View Post)
    Definatly support this.
  • Catelite
    10th Apr 2012 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Oooooh :O Interesting actually, can easily see where this would be useful.
  • mniip
    10th Apr 2012 Developer 0 Permalink
    My tmpr only exchanges temp actually, no ctype work applied
    but, still, no problem of that to be coded
  • Minishooz
    10th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    I like this, but it should edit tmp and life awsell
  • dwarfkoala
    10th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink

    Excellent. I see new, better than ever factorys in the future.

  • disturbed666
    10th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    Wow this sounds great, it's one of those post that is really useful. Hope the mods implent it
  • code1949
    11th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    Thank you all for your positive feedback. :D

    @Minishooz (View Post)
    I'll try and think up of a way for that to work. I'm currently wondering if it would be possible for it to add life when it is active and receives a signal from WIRE and remove life when it receives a signal from WIRE when it is inactive.INST may be a good candidate to do the same for the tmp variable. However, I'll need someone with coding experience to tell me if those two features are possible.
  • EqualsThree
    11th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    Now let's wait for Simon and Lockheed to approve. xD.
  • code1949
    13th Apr 2012 Member 0 Permalink
    So would anyone wish to suggest any other modifications, amendments or changes to my suggestion?