-
Started 16th Apr 2012 in Feedback
I was suggesting that limiting saves would be nicer than removing them retroactively for being sucky. :<<br/> Please don't quote random people to defend your own causes.
-
Started 16th Apr 2012 in Help
It's art. Why should we care? I mean unless it's sucky art, this -is- what people like. :P Can't stop people from being fools.
-
Started 16th Apr 2012 in Help
that's not the system at fault. There's just a lot of crappy saves with three votes, and not a lot of awesome stuff :P
-
Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
Though a lot of element suggest saves are basically pixel art, so
-
Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
besides number 4, we already do all this. sorry o___o
-
Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
I just removed that save from front page for having no content. Ever since that justin beiber hate save got like 300 votes for having nothing more than a few signs and a silly name, we...
-
Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
Honestly I think everything's just fine like it is. o.o; We've always had tons of crap saves, really.
-
Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
Wouldn't it just be easier to limit the number of saves a user can publish per day, or set it so that saves which have already been published cannot be made more recent? or something? o.o; ...
-
Started 13th Apr 2012 in Help
Actually portal references are appropriate here. Portal elements use the same mechanic as WIFI does to transmit sparks/elements from point A to B. :3
-
Started 12th Apr 2012 in General
Moo, I never get viruses, and I never use an anti-virus. I just have a silly freeware firewall called Comodo, and use Noscript for firefox o.o