• Started 16th Apr 2012 in Feedback
    I was suggesting that limiting saves would be nicer than removing them retroactively for being sucky. :<<br/>  Please don't quote random people to defend your own causes.
  • Started 16th Apr 2012 in Help
    It's art. Why should we care?    I mean unless it's sucky art, this -is- what people like. :P Can't stop people from being fools.
  • Started 16th Apr 2012 in Help
    that's not the system at fault. There's just a lot of crappy saves with three votes, and not a lot of awesome stuff :P
  • Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
    Though a lot of element suggest saves are basically pixel art, so
  • Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
    besides number 4, we already do all this.    sorry o___o
  • Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
    I just removed that save from front page for having no content.    Ever since that justin beiber hate save got like 300 votes for having nothing more than a few signs and a silly name, we&#...
  • Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
    Honestly I think everything's just fine like it is. o.o; We've always had tons of crap saves, really. 
  • Started 14th Apr 2012 in Feedback
    Wouldn't it just be easier to limit the number of saves a user can publish per day, or set it so that saves which have already been published cannot be made more recent? or something? o.o; ...
  • Started 13th Apr 2012 in Help
    Actually portal references are appropriate here. Portal elements use the same mechanic as WIFI does to transmit sparks/elements from point A to B.    :3
  • Started 12th Apr 2012 in General
    Moo, I never get viruses, and I never use an anti-virus. I just have a silly freeware firewall called Comodo, and use Noscript for firefox o.o