New Power Source by MattF1
It wont allow me to place any more signs, so i'll put more info here: The receivers on Earth will be carefully positioned to have the most efficient and cost effective setup, and the microwave beaming system will be carefully aimed.
notsonearfuture
notdestroyable
power
Comments
-
cj646464 21st Nov 2012
The moon doesn't have an atmosphere. -
Messanger64 19th Nov 2012
My question is why place it on the moon? Wouldn't it be less costly just to have to place it in Earth's atmosphere, which would make it easier and less costly to access and set up, and still recieve more direct sunlight because it doesn't have to go throught he moon's atmosphere? -
Reshiram147 19th Nov 2012
you're so epic as a save creator ;) a vote up! -
RainierL 19th Nov 2012
DO you know you need a 10 square kilometer dish to on earth to recieve the signal beam efeciantly? How will earth look with al those arrays on its surface? -
circovik 17th Nov 2012
Ikr, people need to learn their facts -
FeynmanTechnologies 16th Nov 2012
I'm surprised no one has realised this; The "dark side" of the moon is a myth. There is a side that never faces the EARTH, but all sides are lighted equally. -
Exmax 15th Nov 2012
...... -
Monooki_no_Ryu 14th Nov 2012
Disadventages: Not the whole Earth can be reached at once; The beam might "zap" clods, planes, birds, ect.; It would cost lots of money to construct; It would take years to get the equipment and some people up there; Because the moon has no atmosphere, these photocollectors would be endangered by asteriods. -
Soap 14th Nov 2012
AgeStar, and that would'nt be too good :S -
AgeStar 14th Nov 2012
Interesting idea, although strong microwave radiation may heat up planet and cause bad health effects.