Part 2. (Essentially, a whole bunch of little, easy to burn tertiary stages.) He also points out that the radiation channels from the secondary in such a configuartion would raise some difficult design problems, however. But nothing that appeared definitely unworkable. Of course, it's only a sketch of a sketch of a proof of design concept. Only A. Sakharov knows for sure how they did it! (Well, maybe one or two others.) Again, just a great job - a model worthy of the actual device.
Part 1. Beautiful job. The dimensions are excellent and the tail assembly is especially well done. There's nothing exact in the open literature, but Sublette has given some good technical reasons why a "single unit" 3rd stage may not have been possible - at least not for the 100M version in gravity bomb form. He speculates that the tertiary stage consisted of multiple separate LiD packets salted with generous amounts of T to make sure they ignited relatively easily.
its cool :) ! the explosion is not so big but the bomb is detailed end real. so is the bomb real-life too !
not so strong like the real one but the most realistic design
cool +1 but the tsar bomba was 50 megatons and not 50 tons
this is the tsar bomba at 100mt (the third stage was a uranium one though.)
you need a neutron emitter near the primary fission fuel(the leftmost) and also you need a parachute and maybe some fuel between the warhead and the rest of the bomb (im not sure bout the fuel)
this is the best nuclear bomb ive seen
Holy_wasabi, first of all, SINGULARITY HAS NEVER BEEN MADE BY HUMANS, Second, i dont think anyone's dumb enough to kill us all by compressing us into practically a 1 demintional dot.