bomb_creator
bomb_creator
2 / 0
24th July
30th July
(I know this isn't a kilonova, but the aesthetics of it mimic a kilonova) WHY IS THIS BOMB SO POWERFUL??? (note: This isn't a kilonova anymore, don't obey the title.)

Comments

  • spiky_potato_viper
    spiky_potato_viper
    27th July
    the only requiment is that an azure must have warp and gbmb
  • spiky_potato_viper
    spiky_potato_viper
    27th July
    also, azure use all energy particle, azures are just not allowed to use particles that directly destroy other particles, like non-explosive sing, amtr, dest, cray, and dray
  • spiky_potato_viper
    spiky_potato_viper
    27th July
    neut liquifies rsss, phot and elec are better at burning insl that is not exposed
  • bomb_creator
    bomb_creator
    27th July
    turned from a kilonova to a smaller version of a supernova
  • bomb_creator
    bomb_creator
    27th July
    now it doesn't leave plutonium behind
  • bomb_creator
    bomb_creator
    27th July
    don't azure bombs only use protons? give reasons why i need to include neutron, electrons, photons (like in the azure lotus)
  • spiky_potato_viper
    spiky_potato_viper
    27th July
    first and foremost, an actual detonation would have prot, neut, and elec. secondly, it's an excessive amount of deut. it's going to hit the particle cap way before the deut is used, so you can make it much smaller.
  • bomb_creator
    bomb_creator
    26th July
    correction: the bomb does still leave plutonium behind even with neutrons.
  • bomb_creator
    bomb_creator
    26th July
    Leaves plutonium behind. The neutron version (type: !set type prot neut) leaves nothing behind.
  • KyleTheCreator
    KyleTheCreator
    26th July
    very gud