dirtguy11211
dirtguy11211
25 / 3
15th January
22nd January
///CAUTION\\\ Not a text-only save. Examples provided. Free to copy mechanisms with credit. Meant to be informational. so.... uh, yeah. enjoy! (sorry this save stops so abrupptly, it's hard to fit so much info in one save.)

Comments

  • Builderbob101
    Builderbob101
    22nd January
    dirtguy11211: what about ehole
  • dirtguy11211
    dirtguy11211
    21st January
    VIBR: Yeah.... maybe so. but I think theres more out there.
  • VIBR
    VIBR
    21st January
    Ngl i feel azures have plateuxed. Destroyable defenses have long since started going towards dealing with DEST /BOMB/WARP/AMTR.
  • dirtguy11211
    dirtguy11211
    19th January
    Builderbob101: No, still against the rules.
  • dirtguy11211
    dirtguy11211
    19th January
    Thank you, @ShadowStorm123 and @alice_loona_OT12 for correcting my grammar issues :)
  • ShadowStorm123
    ShadowStorm123
    19th January
    you misspelled technology. You accidenatlly wrote "technolegy" with an e instead of an o.
  • Builderbob101
    Builderbob101
    19th January
    question wouldn't snow with the ctype antimatter be fine because technically it's just snow?
  • pseudomon
    pseudomon
    18th January
    pinnapple
  • alice_loona_OT12
    alice_loona_OT12
    18th January
    however, it is spelled "pinnacle"
  • dirtguy11211
    dirtguy11211
    18th January
    Hunter1: that's my point.