but lesser green would make it lean mroe to blue, since you lessened the green without lessening the blue, so it would be more blue, plus, adding red to cyan making a lighter magenta (basically pink) isn't related to cyan, since you add red, of which cyan does not have, thus it wouldn't not be cyan, so no, cyan is more blue.
*continued from below comment* Also, LESS green doesn't mean NO green, thus a shade of cyan with less green still has green and is still not blue. Here's further evidence id:3278905
Qemmen: the fact that red light and cyan make white light IS proof that cyan is not blue, because red light and blue light make magenta light; if cyan was blue than red light and cyan light would instead make a lighter kind of magenta.
saying that red and cyan make white isn't proof that cyan is not blue, because then it simply wouldn't be cyan anyways, plus there are multiple shades of cyan with less green.
jsut because cyan is "brighter than blue" doesn't make it not blue, thats what shades are, so yes, it can be considering blue.
I forgot to mention in the below comment that mixing red light and blue light makes magenta light but mixing red light with cyan light makes white light; further proof that cyan isn't blue.
Qemmen: Cyan is NOT a type of blue; cyan is brighter than blue and cyan light can replicated by mixing blue light and green light.
cyan is a type of blue -1
I replaced the red bit in the violet that looks yellow with a red bit that actually looks red.