@SUSaNOO, ID:2234025 ID:2411047 ID:2547444 ID:2458095 ID:1569660 ID:1563707 ID:2749005
Earthblox: Hmm, I don't think those can be compared. The internet requires large means of data storage, whereas doom would require faster rendering and processing. The Internet and windows both need considerably more memory to run.
I have a feeling if these could run Windows and the internet we could potentially run doom
k cool, now run an atari game on it :trol:
@RaconTPT, Okay. But what about in reference to this computer? The FTC-Sigma is the fastest, but what would the runtime be like for, say, 1,000 generations of a simple BRAN simulation be like? How quickly could it manage to spit out information to the monitor to tell it to update to a new image when running a GOL sim?
In theory upu can make a 60hz subframe GOL but that is without a general perpous computer.
@SUSaNOO, Oh wow! I made a blunder in my words... I meant, I wonder what the refresh rate in a program running real-time GOL simulations would look like. The 60hz monitor could run... at 60hz... but the program could theoretically still only be able to render at a refresh rate of, say, 1hz or less.