You do realize that the majority of people who saw this and voted didn't even comment, right? So don't get your panties' in a bunch just because you see a couple of people say they didn't like it. Seriously, only 37 out of the 184 who even voted at all downvoted, and less than 10 of them felt brave enough to give their opinions about it. The math adds up to 147 out of 184 people actually LIKING this save, including me.
OMFG, y'all can just stop writing your needless amount of paragraphs that needn't be written. Honestly, I scrolled through and saw you talking about nothing. Very few of you made some valid points, but that was all. Granted, the only valid points I saw were "don't like furries or whatever, still good art +1", and the like, but that was commented from like two people, maybe.
The comment section is like a damn fractal, lol.
I think we could add more realistic elements, I just don't think we need to change some unrealistic properties of existing elements, it would make the game less fun if we had to always be "realistic"
@RCAProduction That level of interaction can be achieved in real time only in 2d with current computers. Making it 3d will be equal to running about 300 TPTs at the same time.
Probably. TBH, pedal it for whatever you want. If I was in a school and wanted to use TPT freely, I'd say it was educational. But honestly, it's not. You can only have limited accuracy in 2D, especially with particles like this.
so ur tellin me that the forum post about whether tpt is educational can be considered debatable?