PortalPlayer
PortalPlayer
2 / 3
17th Jun 2018
13th Jul 2018
Actually faster than HEAC. Updated to not drag the temps down to 22.
heat prot heac

Comments

  • RaconTPT
    RaconTPT
    3rd Sep 2021
    prot moves at ~2px, heac conducts across 4px per frame => heac is faster. but maybe if you used enough prot it would have a higher conductivity than a line of heac would as prot is more stackable.
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE
    16th Jul 2018
    Actually its not much faster, it just doesnt lose as much heat, because [my second comment]
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE
    16th Jul 2018
    @PortalPlayer Yes it gets the heat faster but, my previous comment explains why it gets faster, and why its not 'fair' to the HEAC.
  • PortalPlayer
    PortalPlayer
    13th Jul 2018
    NoVIcE: in the previous version, there was a constant stream of new protons; I've thought about putting it back. I am fully aware of the HEAC dissipating heat, but the point is it actually gets to the other end faster.
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE
    13th Jul 2018
    Actually the reason its faster is because the heat has to dissipate over 1500 particles of HEAC and the final/start destinations, versus only 250 particles of PROT, to make it fair you should make the particles of PROT and HEAC equal.
  • NoVIcE
    NoVIcE
    13th Jul 2018
    Cool, heat transfer at the speed of light, kinda +1