this shouldnt be on FP, -1
bloody hell, vip. stop being so good, you already outshined me when you started making the arts :( +1
VIP84, emperorOfChemicals, you may have missd it, but I concluded with pretty much the same. ;-) Knowing that many people are interested in some of the science or simply unaware of those facts, I wanted to pitch in and note this here. However, I realize this is (no need to use profanity here) art, and actually upvoted it.
This is a great save, dude. :D
Also, thanks everyone! :D
@TheNik well, considering there is no atmosphere on the comet, and the only light source is the nearest star to it, it would be kinda possible to see some of the galaxies' cosmic dust, but this is also just art, i can exaggerate, and it doesn't necessarily have to be realistic
This is due to a certain concentration of carbon compounds contained in the ice, which make it nowhere near as bright blue as seen here. Having said that, this is a nice art save, and while not entirely realistic, it makes for a great scenery. Have an upvote. ;-)
Next, a comet spends the vast majority of its time far away from it's host star, if any. This means that the surface is illuminated rather dimly. But that's not even the main cause - if you ever saw photos of 67P, taken from Rosetta, bear in mind, even what you see there was heavily brightened, because it was pitch black originally.
It is a misconception to think that a comet's surface or galaxies would look like this. Neihter Adndromeda nor the Milky way or Triangulum Galaxy would be as bright as here - as an anaolgy, we too have satellite galaxies like Andromeda's Triangulum, the Magellanic Clouds, and we can't see them as brightly.