3D art ^^ by NiceKi11

Self_Destruct 2nd Sep 2016

@Sandwichlizard and @EXCISION Calm down, both of you! We were just giving our opinions! Whatever happened to "let's clean up our language?" Whatever happened to "it's a game?"

Sandwichlizard 2nd Sep 2016

@EXCISION. If you take a motion picture. as in cell film they used to play at around 24 frames per second and it seemed smooth. after 60 the human eye can really not discern any flicker at all. However you can still run the film faster and it looks like everything is happening faster. that is what happens when we talk about fps here in powder. IT IS NOT ABOUT FRAME RATE FLICKER! IT IS ABOUT THE ACTION HAPPENING FASTER YOU DOLT! now calm the hell down.

yektak 2nd Sep 2016

Looks like a hologram. Nice!

atomic2385 2nd Sep 2016

Eyes do have a 'refresh rate' of sorts-when light interacts with the pigment in our retina, this releases an electrical signal along the optic nerve, which we percieve as colour. these chemicals then need to be 'reset'- i.e. turned back into the chemicals thy originally were so they can absorb light again. obviously, not all cells on the retina are in sync, which is why we do not have a framerate, but each individual cell has its own rate at which it can send new packets of info.

randle 2nd Sep 2016

WHY ITS SO SMALL

EXCISION 2nd Sep 2016

Comparing a damn computer screen refresh rate is different to a human eye. And one more thing, of course you can't tell difference between 60hz and 98598798735897394857345 fps because your SCREENS BASE REFRESh RATE IS 60 FPS and therefore isn't even capable of showing such fps... really people stop this "how much fps does human eye see" shit, it's stupid.

EXCISION 2nd Sep 2016

And time, is relative to different species, and time, is just an illusion that we created to understand and measure.

EXCISION 2nd Sep 2016

how long does it really take for you all to understand that we do not process image digitally in our head? our vision doesn't lag, it is biologically optical and stabilized constant image and the time we feel passing isn't measured in fps, it is just this image at a constant speed of the observed speed of time.

EXCISION 2nd Sep 2016

you are all thinking like we are computers. we only see constant image, there isn't any refresh rates in our eyes. We are not digital, only digital devices have refresh rates and fps, but we are purely analogical biological creatures, not any damn computers with refresh rates, we can tell difference between fps rates but we ourselves do not see flicking images drawn and rendered frame by frame

Self_Destruct 1st Sep 2016

@Sandwichlizard Yeah. The update rate is directly related to the fps, so it literally is slower or faster depending on the fps.

The Powder Toy

3D art ^^ by NiceKi11

Comments