xteric
xteric
22 / 3
11th Jul 2016
11th Jul 2016
A device smaller than the "smallest" replicator.
replicator keepthesfpitag kevinsayskeep sfpi

Comments

  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    15th Jul 2016
    There were a few made that were smaller than this, none were realliy signaficantly smaller though. I think we need something new to make smaller, perhaps ID:2014974
  • Windspren
    Windspren
    14th Jul 2016
    I made an improved version of this type too, which is a few pixels smaller.
  • xteric
    xteric
    13th Jul 2016
    Exactly!
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    13th Jul 2016
    It seems fair to say that it is the smallest, but not the smallest of this type.
  • Windspren
    Windspren
    13th Jul 2016
    It is reusable.
  • xteric
    xteric
    13th Jul 2016
    Well it leaves it behind and then it's not functional anymore. It should be reusable.
  • Windspren
    Windspren
    12th Jul 2016
    @xteric the stuff it leaves behind is basically part of it. What it's doing is creating a duplicator behind it to duplicate it, kind of how PSTN duplicators push a duplicator behind themselves. It definetly should qualify.
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    12th Jul 2016
    How did you stop this < one from breaking half the time?
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    12th Jul 2016
    I put another one at the top of ID:2012730 Although it doesn't seem to work all of the time, and isn't quite 8x11.
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    12th Jul 2016
    Well, you could include the stuff that it leaves behind as a part of it and it would still work.