xteric
xteric
22 / 3
11th Jul 2016
11th Jul 2016
A device smaller than the "smallest" replicator.
replicator keepthesfpitag kevinsayskeep sfpi

Comments

  • Windspren
    Windspren
    22nd Jul 2016
    My smaller replicator can replicate other things and doesn't replicate continuosly.
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    18th Jul 2016
    It would be good if we could find another way to replicate things that is still useful.
  • xteric
    xteric
    18th Jul 2016
    The only problem with thesee smaller (apart from the piston replicators the_new_powder99999 did) replicators is that they either continously copy themselves and/or cannot copy something else with them. I aim to create something which can be fastened onto something and replicate itself with the target and be able to replicate it on said command.
  • xteric
    xteric
    18th Jul 2016
    jeffluo, ask the guy who made me do it.
  • jeffluo35
    jeffluo35
    16th Jul 2016
    the_new_powder99999: lol
  • the_new_powder99999
    the_new_powder99999
    16th Jul 2016
    I was actually thinking that putting "World's smallest" in the title when it isn't the smallest is a good idea. That is what started this entire thing. (ID:1631824 was smaller than most replicators created recently)
  • jeffluo35
    jeffluo35
    16th Jul 2016
    Oh, and friendly piece of advice: Don't write "World's [something]est" in the title, because when it isn't anymore, people will start hating....
  • jeffluo35
    jeffluo35
    16th Jul 2016
    just kidding, it was 54 parts (typo, sorry)
  • jeffluo35
    jeffluo35
    16th Jul 2016
    (13 by 7, 53 parts total)
  • jeffluo35
    jeffluo35
    16th Jul 2016
    Even smaller! id:2015847