Instant incrementer V2! by mniip
I've reviewed the previous design, which appeared to be totally inefficient, and made this. Also features a 1-per-frame counter setup.
data
transfer
sprk
60hz
subframe
electronics
filt
Comments
-
mniip 12th Jan 2015
@Schmolendevice The CONV/BTRY device at the top is my ingenious invention that creates a subframe down-pointing ARAY (actually down-left) and that can be placed at every 4 pixels. If you were to come up with a narrower design of the same thing I could easily shrink this to 3 pixels per bit. -
Schmolendevice 12th Jan 2015
Well, I've finally got myself a 3 pixel per bit and 'laterally thinner' vertical binary counter design I just have to outfit with solid spark. Some of the solid spark might probably lower its compactness laterally. -
Elite01 12th Jan 2015
May i make a binary counter using your save? -
Schmolendevice 12th Jan 2015Yep, figured. I'd still imagine there's still a little subframe stuff hidden in the XORs. Plus the BTRY/CONV junctions on top look intimidating but are part of your design. Anyways I will be sticking to my own vertical sub-frame adders for now. Getting somewhere. *well indeed sigma and a prety integral symbol.
-
Garuda 12th Jan 2015
Why do i slightly recognise your symbol...? umm.... -
mniip 12th Jan 2015@Schmolendevice Yes I prefer ARAY to FILT[tmp=6]. Those CRAY lines aren't essential but they give a hint of where a CRAY ray (deletion ray in this case) starts and where it leads. I don't seem to see any extra ARAY lines though. The DTECs around that place are essential, you can see a PHOT placed right next to them, those DTECs reset the XOR'ing FILTs to their initial state.
-
mniip 12th Jan 2015No, I'm listed in the developers list in F1 text though!
-
987tails 12th Jan 2015
thought you were a moderater ;/ -
mniip 12th Jan 2015@the_new_powder99999 CONV+BTRY depends solely on particle order. If not CONV+BTRY this machine wouldn't be sub-frame.
-
thespazz 11th Jan 2015
well. at least it wouldnt be able to do the filt mem as well.