Toni
Toni
84 / 13
24th Sep 2014
24th Sep 2014
The old methods are always the best !
electrolosys electrolysis electrodynamics oxyg hygn orginisation

Comments

  • Thomas16105
    Thomas16105
    30th Sep 2014
    This looks so cool! how did you do this?
  • PortalPlayer
    PortalPlayer
    28th Sep 2014
    Sounds to me like if you want to sound "cool" by writing the formula, you really ought to know what you're talking about because else, as is evident, more knowledgeable people tell you a million times over you're wrong. Learn your stuff first, mate.
  • PortalPlayer
    PortalPlayer
    28th Sep 2014
    Your equation is not balanced. Not enough hydrogen on the left.
  • NorthMustang
    NorthMustang
    27th Sep 2014
    The machine isn't entirely complete, as it does not have a water converter, but you may realize that if you add a water converter that the production will - depending on the size of the converter - be cut in half. Anyway, I'll give it a +1
  • MatthewY
    MatthewY
    27th Sep 2014
    Schneumer why are you always so negative???
  • MatthewY
    MatthewY
    27th Sep 2014
    Awesome! Can you reverse this?
  • Flamessmith
    Flamessmith
    27th Sep 2014
    @Vanir Your equation is incorrect as well. Even though the notation of the states of matter of the products and reactants is important, this is such a well known reaction that it is an unncessary use of space. Also, it is incorrect to notate the number of atoms as a fraction because atoms in such a chemical reactions will never split into a faction, they will always exist in whole number quantities throughout the reaction.
  • Flamessmith
    Flamessmith
    27th Sep 2014
    @GADaTsar If you were to be typing a chemistry paper on a word proccessor without subscripts, the notation you provided in your first comment would be interpreted as gibberish, since all numbers in the equation were written without the indication of what was a whole number and what was a subscript.
  • Flamessmith
    Flamessmith
    27th Sep 2014
    @GADaTsar If I was indicating hydrogen peroxide it would be correctly notated: H_2O_2 because there are two hydrogens and two oxygens. What I was indicating in my first coment that there were two molecules of H_2O. You seem to be misinformed about how subscripts are notated, any number that follows a "_" is a subscipt.
  • Flamessmith
    Flamessmith
    27th Sep 2014
    @GADaTsar: To clarify, what I was indicating was that 2 water molecules decompose to form 2 dihydrogen atoms and one dioxygen atom.