Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh
forsciense
imscienstist
realistictpt
speedoflight
phot
stne
logic
timetravel
press7please
Comments
-
And physics broke down, and time exploded.
-
@robogeek537 nah I did this myself... But then we get that every frame for a stationary observer is 7.35 frames for the STNE. Time definitely slows down, but that contradicts the logic we're using.
-
CRAP!!! I had an ingenious idea but forgot it while I was reading the comments!!! D'oh!
-
So, now, I guess my brother "Toxic10" is making stuff now. (But it will be a while)
-
This is my brother's account, so yeah, I just wanted to say that...
-
Everyone in this galaxy, in this sector, in this certain universe, in this realm of time and space... Is a time traveler. Us = moving forward in time, time = watching us move through it.
-
If you have a scientific calculator sitting around, Ferne, put the values in there as the whole, don't simplify, or else you get an i(maginary number) as you got before.
-
So I'm taking 3p/f as c in TPT and the maximum STNE speed is 8p/f. 3p/f is the default PHOT speed in a straight line. In diagonal it's 2sqrt(2), so about 2.83p/f. Getting in your equations:
-
t=t1/(sqrt(1-(v^2-c^2))) t*sqrt(1-(v^2-c^2))=t1 t1=1f*sqrt(1-((8p/f)^2-(3p/f)^2)) See it yet? t1=1f*sqrt(1-(64p^2/f^2-9p^2/f^2)) t1=1f*sqrt(1-(55p^2/f^2)) t1=1f*sqrt(-54) Yeah. Complex numbers. t1 = 7.35if. What does that tell us? Umm...
-
I put 1 pixel of sand next to the stone and the sand fell FASTER THEN THE PHOTON AND THE STONE!!!!!