Since nobody reads these things, just look at the explanation in the actual simulation. And please POLITELY correct me if I'm wrong, okay. I'm only 12 years old.
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh
forsciense
imscienstist
realistictpt
speedoflight
phot
stne
logic
timetravel
press7please
Comments
-
The kid does have a point, if you cant go faster than the speed of light and a photon is light, the faster you go, the more dense you get and going at the speed of light means that you have infinite mass... But if you could go faster, you will warp the fabric of time and space thus changing time and space... I'm not sure if you will go forward or backwards but when you think about it... it does make sense... i could go into deeper detail if you want me to but ill just leave it here
-
to the stne particle, time would be at almost a standstill, but to the rest of the universe, would be traveling normally in time, albeit at the spped of light. Although keep in mind that this is a simulation!
-
Im also 12,and i dont understand
-
Like Schneumer said: a SIMULATION. Nothing more.
-
The speed of light in powder toy is EXTREMLY slow compared to real life. This save does a very good job of showing that fact. Anyyhing with mass cannot exceed the speed of light. This save is very misleading and only got attention because of that misleading name.
-
Wow! it actually time travelled! although forward in time at the usual rate. :)
-
tpt update should come with faster particle acceleration after this...i think
-
kyle......photons would not move at the real speed of light in a pixelated SIMULATION....key word SIMULATION. U scale real world to this.....and let's just be honest. Does a useless observation of one of many ways how tpt is unrealistic seem like an fp thing to you? Does it? (sry about the tpt unrealistic thing mods, but it's the truth.....kind of :p)
-
pqrt is faster
-
SAND, SALT and BRMT are faster than STNE falling