The Powder Toy

4D Powder Toy

  • PackedBread     2nd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink
    Considering the string-theory statement of 12 dimensions, and with a quick writeup of a complete molecular physics system built on the string and quantum theory, one could totally go 12-dimensional. Why bother with petty one-digit dimensions?
    Edited once by PackedBread. Last: 2nd Feb 2014
  • mniip     2nd Feb 2014 Developer 5 Permalink
    image
  • CeeJayBee     2nd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    @mniip (View Post)

     You sir, are a genius.

  • BoredInSchool     2nd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    I can actually envision 4D objects in 4 dimensions in my head(took alot of time to get my mind to be able to think that way, but it works). 4D TPT would be cool.

  • nijalninja98     3rd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    well... if i knew anything about scripting and whatnot i wouls say something likt this, "NO, why are you even talking about this" and then i would ban everyone.

  • mniip     3rd Feb 2014 Developer 0 Permalink
    @BoredInSchool (View Post)
    Nah, imagining a rotaing tesseract and simplex is not 4-dimensional thinking.
    Can you imagine what object do you get at an intersection of 3 spaces (not parallel)?
  • therocketeer     3rd Feb 2014 Member 1 Permalink

    What you are seeing here is a 2D representation of a 3D shadow of a 4D object
    image
    Edited 2 times by therocketeer. Last: 3rd Feb 2014
  • CeeJayBee     3rd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink
    This post has been removed by jacob1: direct quote / image spam
  • therocketeer     3rd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink
    @CeeJayBee (View Post)
    well mine spins
  • CeeJayBee     3rd Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    @CeeJayBee (View Post)

     I was afraid you'd do that.

    @therocketeer (View Post)

     Well mine says WAT repeatedly

You need to login before you can post replies
Locked by jacob1: generic lock reason