Electrolysis of CO2

  • tery215
    17th Jun 2013 Member 0 Permalink

    Would make Co2, when under the same parameters that water electrolyzes,(should make the Co2) become a (broken)coal particle and an OXYG particle.

     

    Also maybe electrolysis for a lot of chemical reactions.

  • xetalim
    17th Jun 2013 Member 4 Permalink

    @tery215 (View Post)

     no, breaks basicly most of the saves that use the fusion.

    Fusion makes

    CO2, OXYG, NBLE, ELEC and PHOT

    ELEC electrolysises(bad spelling) WATR

    that would mean

    ELEC+CO2 makes BCOL

    Breaks fusion.

  • tery215
    17th Jun 2013 Member 1 Permalink

    I don't understand how broken coal is an unacceptable result of fusion.

    Noble gas already eats up electrons and oxygen gas turns into lava, CO2 logically shouldn't be part of the fusion chain.

  • Michael238
    17th Jun 2013 Member 1 Permalink

    @xetalim (View Post)

     Simple fix: Make CO2 electrolyze only on contact with SPRK, instead of it electrolyzing on contact with ELEC.

  • xetalim
    17th Jun 2013 Member 0 Permalink

    @Michael238 (View Post)

     would break even more

    @tery215 (View Post)

    ''Noble gas already eats up electrons and oxygen gas turns into lava''

    well

    OXYG DOESNT turn to lava

    it only turns to lava when gravity applied(GPMP, NGRV, GRAV)

    "CO2 logically shouldn't be part of the fusion chain."

     CO2 should be part, otherwise you would break EVEN more saves.

  • tery215
    17th Jun 2013 Member 0 Permalink

    What about sparked iron changing CO2 to broken coal and oxygen?

  • xetalim
    17th Jun 2013 Member 2 Permalink
  • Cacophony
    17th Jun 2013 Member 0 Permalink

    @tery215 (View Post)

     The way fusion works, it's basically this:

    Hydrogen->Helium->Carbon

    As neither helium nor carbon are exactly in TPT, Noble Gas is used like helium, and CO2 as Carbon.

    While you may argue BCOL is carbon, the point is that all since TPT fusion involves gases, a powder doesn't make sense.Not to mention that it's rather impractical to use BCOL from fusion, since it takes a lot of energy, and BCOL breaks the whole point of using fusion(high amount of heat and pressure released)as it's rather weak.

  • greymatter
    17th Jun 2013 Member 0 Permalink
    @tery215 (View Post)
    But that's the way it is, and thousands of bomb saves rely on it. And BCOL as a byproduct of fusion is weird. Just think, fusion raining down carbon when it is initiated....pretty weird indeed.

    But sparked iron rods turning CO2 into C(BCOL) and O2 seems acceptable, although if it was that simple in real life there would be no global warming.
  • Potbelly
    17th Jun 2013 Banned 0 Permalink
    This post is hidden because the user is banned