the wifi limits

  • disturbed666
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    i was thinking about the wifi limit's sincerly i see more poeple suggesting for more channels or increasing the heat limit for it. we all know that there are 100 channels what if we add extra channels by letting tmp adding a new series of channels.

    example of what i mean
    tmp 0 100 channels
    tmp 1 100 channels
    tmp 2 100 channels
    still working by heating them and seperate from each other
    so tmp 0 channels and tmp 1channels wont send each other a signal. this would increase the amount of wifi channels a lot.

    hope you like this idea give feedback of what you think
  • Dragonfree97
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I think that's probably the best solution for the problem, yeah. Plus - if you were to have 100 tmp channels and 100 temp channels, that's 10,000 different channels, and I can't see anyone running out of those.

    inb4 tommig says 'lag'
  • tommig
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    @dragonfree97
    Nah...
    @Everyone
    There may be a chance of a flame war between me and dragonfree
    just thought I'd let you know

  • disturbed666
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @Dragonfree97!173878thanks for your support. and i also don't think that anything uses 10000 different channels xD the whole screen then exist from wifi lolzzz
  • THElagB3AST
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    That sounds amazing i already suggested inf channels but they said it was impossible, and i think this is a perfect solution for it!!!
  • disturbed666
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    hope a mod also likes this and hope it's possible.
  • DRAGONF0RCE
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    We definitely need this. People always say that 101 is enough, but I've used 168 and had to include PRTI/O for 67 of them.
  • Neospector
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    disturbed666:

     i also don't think that anything uses 10000 different channels

    And that is why we do not need this. We have two hundred channels, plus the ability to cross wires with INST and the ability to use ARAY.
    Why do we need any more long-range spark-teleporting electronics if we have all of these?
    Get creative people, don't just use WIFI, use something creative. In fact, when my brother gets done with his report, I'll make something that doesn't even use WIFI for the heck of it. Just because I can.
  • DRAGONF0RCE
    26th Oct 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    Neospector:

    And that is why we do not need this. We have two hundred channels, plus the ability to cross wires with INST and the ability to use ARAY.

    Why do we need any more long-range spark-teleporting electronics if we have all of these?
    Get creative people, don't just use WIFI, use something creative.
    This uses 168 channels and over 1500 inputs/outputs. As computers people make get more complicated, we're going to need more than 202.

    ~521325

    Try to fit that much ARAY or INST into a box about 400x400 pixels.

    The link is broken on my screen; I don't know what the problem is. Type user:dragonf0rce into the TPT search bar and choose Connect Four.
  • Catelite
    26th Oct 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Not sure having more wifi channels would be a bad thing. But there aren't any simple ways to increase the number that wouldn't become maddening to deal with after a while.