Advanced Electronics Club
-
Now check
-
Actually I want you to repeat that, because then you'll learn that. Now you joined sucessfully.
-
INST or INWR both could've been used because they both get CRAY to go through anything without deleting and therefore make it able to go through pixels placed by the CRAY. INWR is more convenient to spark from the NSCN delay bit instead of changing it to NSCN ---> INWR ---> PSCN ---> INST which would take up much more space and just be impracticle.
-
Eh, without any modiication? Actually I could just put ARAY in front of INST to have the same effects
-
You asked for without any modification.
Well, you could've used INST or INWR in that spot actually because both get CRAY to go through anything without deleting making it able to go through the pixels placed by the CRAY underneath; but INWR is more convenient to SPRK from the small NSCN delay bit rather than changing it to NSCN-->INWR-->PSCN-->INST.
-
CRAY's tmp2. If you know, PM me, reward 3 points for anyone who can tell.
I'll show the answer on October 5th, so be quick!
-
PM'ed you, did I get there first?
-
The source says something about tmp2<<8 but as I am not familiar with C++ I have no idea what that means.
-
Sorry, but @minecraft-physics get there first. You did it wrong. I asked CRAY not PSTN
You did it very well! Did it take long for you to figure out, or you found it before? +3
Well, try figure it out yourself, without taking close look to the source :)
PLEASE, do not look to the source to figure out anything, it is helpless for any of the members. What I asked you to do is to curious about anything - ANYTHING - ANYTHING and try to find the answer, without the source, by yourself. I am telling you how I get advanced in electonrics right now.
Actually, if you looked into the source, you can only get 1 point.
Edited 3 times by china-richway2. Last: 2nd Oct 2013 -
it actually took me a while, lots of testing and dest rage before I found the answer.
