Adding powders commonly used in science

  • JoshinatorKy
    23rd Dec 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    I don't like how most of the people who are consistently active on this forum always shoot people's ideas down right away. I wish it would go back to where these baboons could not comment on element suggestions.

  • code1949
    23rd Dec 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @JoshinatorKy (View Post)
    I'll put it this way, when you've seen the same idea that was rejected a thousand times, you tend to get really, really pissed. Anyway, new element suggestion rules prevent them from being too harsh.
  • oldmud0
    23rd Dec 2011 Member 0 Permalink

    @TYPE-LANCEL (View Post)

    *gun fire* wee.. snap, crackle, BOOM! *everything explodes again and again until all that is left is molten stone*

    I give up. Go ahead, deny other people's ideas. Put TPT in your destructive games category.

    The point is, TPT is simulation, not destruction. Besides, what if I don't have the time OR money to replicate it in real life? Catelite said, "realism is heavily -not- favored in the game right now," but the right now makes all the difference. The proposal for addition isn't saying that the features proposed will be added immediately. It was a suggestion. Plus, I want constructive criticism, not just shooting down people's ideas so you can rule the game filled with your ideas. Please, this isn't my forum, nor is it your forum either. We need to be nicer next time. Thank you for reading this.
  • TYPE-LANCEL
    23rd Dec 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    @oldmud0 (View Post)
    I wasn't specifically talking about destructive mechanisms, electronics would also fit into the category of things that can't be readily simulated in real life as it is difficult to create electronics that precisely, anyway, I was just being the devil's advocate. The main issue I'm concerned about is the lack of uses for some of the elements since food coloring can be simulated using deco layer or bizarre liquid as well as your argument that "what if I don't have the time OR money to replicate it in real life?" considering that all of the suggested materials are readily available in supermarkets. Normally I would analyze the coding feasibility but currently, I cannot as I have no information on what properties you want the elements to possess, if you provide the features you want it to have, I may be able to think up of a way it could be coded.
  • epicksl
    23rd Dec 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    dude...if u want mundane powders, make a game of ur own....the "realism simulation" this is the powder TOY for a reason....we want outragous explosions! xD i see ur point tho.....these days all saves do is spew dest everywhere =( no real effort in construction. I do electronics and art....so bombs are counterproductive to me =)
  • Catelite
    23rd Dec 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Tired of bickering on this topic, really.
Locked by Catelite: Moo