possibly removing SOAP

  • me4502
    30th Jun 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    It's possible but not recommended to remove an element... Replacing is easy :)
  • boxmein
    30th Jun 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Removing is easy too.
    Just remove any .C linkings(int update_ELEMENTNAME(UPDATE_FUNC_ARGS);) to the element. If it just doesn't react with other elements. Then leave the "#define elementname number" there and it'll be OK. Also you'd need to remove the element description from the element struct.
  • Sylvi
    30th Jun 2011 Moderator 0 Permalink
    It's a step to movable solids. We're not removing it anytime soon. So stop complaining it's useless.
  • savask
    30th Jun 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    Why do you think that it's a step to movable solids? Just I can't remember if somebody officially said that.
    Edited by savask, 2011-06-29 14:54:44
  • boxmein
    30th Jun 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    He doesn't just think that. It kinda is, cause it makes bubbles move as whole. For movable solids we'd need solids to move as whole.
  • savask
    30th Jun 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    Bubbles are just loops of connected particles, no more, no less. It's not step to movable solids, not "try of technology" or so. I even doubt that there are going to appear more elements using connections like in soap.
    Edited by savask, 2011-06-29 15:13:38
  • user25
    30th Jun 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    It is I guess a step but @savask is right, thre is not a reeason they would us the connections like insoap for anything else
  • boxmein
    30th Jun 2011 Former Staff 0 Permalink
    Did you know? ETRD uses connections like soap, except that connection is made of plasma and appears for only one spark.
  • user25
    30th Jun 2011 Member 0 Permalink
    well that is sort of, but it does not stay connected and it is held between to stationary solids
  • savask
    30th Jun 2011 Developer 0 Permalink
    Haha, it's not connection like in soap at all.