Idea: Faster Electronics via TMP values

  • h4zardz1
    27th Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    @OmegaSupreme (View Post)

     oh yeah i think i found it. ARAY.

  • FeynmanLogomaker
    27th Feb 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    Come to think of it, I should probably get back to making things.

  • nijalninja98
    4th Mar 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    Yeah i think that ARAY is the solution to most of this problem, but i can see what you mean.

  • benthecrazy
    4th Mar 2014 Member 1 Permalink

    @Schneumer (View Post)

     I don't think that even with lower SPRK delay time it will be easier for most people to create fast comlex electronics since their creations are not optimized for the highest speeds and sometimes they dont even make use of the currently lowes SPRK delay time. For example I couldn't speed up my Word Printer because if it reads a value from the memory and this value is the command to stop printing a SWCH needs to be turned off before the next reading cycle can starts which takes exactly 8 frames. But a lower SPRK delay time could improve PSCN ARAY heating for lasers and mabye faster piston ships, so simple electronics. My copier that can copy one line every two frames will of course be much easier to build.

  • zBuilder
    10th Mar 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    really fast wires could use INST

  • tery215
    17th Mar 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    we don't need faster electronics, INST was designed specifically for it

  • G-LinuxorU
    19th Mar 2014 Member 1 Permalink

    This sounds a lot like Pulse frequency modulation, you can use it to send massive quantities of data along a single bus but, i learned it's only so useful.

  • h4zardz1
    10th May 2014 Member 0 Permalink
    @OmegaSupreme.
    of course it is useful for electronics, but, we can use PHOT to transfer things faster, and since there is CRAY to create PHOT, and we can reflect it, and can be taken by PSCN+NSCN (no more nasty ARAY/INST) we can make a extreme conductor. not to mention that PHOT can reach >3 Pixel/Frame speed (more than gold).
  • minecraft-physics
    10th May 2014 Member 0 Permalink
    @h4zardz1 (View Post)
    INST is still faster, and easier to use...

    Also, that's borderline necroposting since you haven't really contributed much.
  • mecha-man
    10th May 2014 Member 0 Permalink

    There is already ways of reducing the delay in order to spark the metal again using PRTI or CONV. Its just very difficult for the average person to use because it relies on particle index and orientation.